Skip to main content

Trust Center

Editorial Standards

Last reviewed: February 24, 2026

Our editorial standards prioritize clarity, transparency, and safety over sensationalism. Articles are written for pet owners who need practical guidance.

Standards

  • Differentiate educational guidance from diagnosis.
  • Prefer primary and authoritative references when available.
  • State uncertainty and escalation guidance when risk is high.
  • Document updates with visible review cadence.

Editorial rules

  • Use plain owner-facing language and avoid overstating certainty.
  • Separate educational information from diagnosis, treatment, prescribing, or prognosis.
  • Prefer authoritative veterinary, regulatory, academic, or first-party source references.
  • Label sponsorship, ranking, and data-source limitations where they may affect interpretation.

Update and index standards

  • Pages with missing sources, incomplete reviewer metadata, or unresolved quality flags stay out of the sitemap.
  • Empty policy/category pages are marked noindex until meaningful owner-facing content is present.
  • Corrections should update visible page content and the documented review/source trail.

See also the Advisory Board status and Data Sources registry.